Double Exposure: Safety margins for a Radioactive pollutant are Slimmer than we thought
New Scientist | 1st June, 2002
Nuclear regulators have miscalculated the health risks from one of
the most widespread nuclear pollutants. People are twice as likely
as previously thought to develop cancer after being exposed to
TRITIUM, which is discharged by nuclear plants & factories. (A few
years ago there were plans to dump Tritium into the River Thames)
Radiation experts say the oversight is worrying & people who eat fish
from contaminated waters may have received more radiation than
supposed. Vast amounts were released into the air by nuclear
weapons tests in the 1960s. 1000s of trillions of becquerels are
emitted each year by nuclear plants at Sellafield & Chapelcross in
southern Scotland.
Scientists first became alerted because of discharges from Nycomed
Amersham plant in Cardiff. Levels in fish near the factory were
100s times higher than expected (N. Scientist, 31 Oct.98 p10).
This company make isotopes for the drugs industry. This prompted the
National Radiological Protection Board to look again at the radiation
people are exposed to when they eat Severn estuary fish. Evidence
suggests tritium carbon compounds persist in the body & that the
biological effect of tritium in WATER may be more damaging. So
there is a higher chance that the beta radiation from tritium will
trigger tumour growth.
Barrie Lambert, radiation expert from St. Barts Hosp., London, says
the findings could have significant implictions for people who eat a
lot of fishfrom around the Cardiff plant. Their current radiation
dose could double to 133 microsieverts a year & in the past that dose
could have been twice as high.
|